Wheel of Justice
By: Amy Hoyt
100 New Jobs Could Become Reality
By: Jessi Chapin
Murder Investigation Continues 1 Year Later
By: Mary Scott Speigner
Bay County Suggests Winter Weather Preparations
By: Elizabeth Cate
Martin Lee Anderson Remembered
By: Elizabeth Cate
Children and Cold Weather
By: Rebecca Underwood
Plans Launch for Beach Pier
By: Kevin Character
Beach Trail Plans Move Forward
By: Kevin Character
Quarantined Dog Missing From Holding Area
Source: Jackson County Health Department
Superintendent Names New Principal for Oakland Terrace
Source: Bay District Schools
For Additional Headlines - go to our News Section »
-
One Man Killed in Washington County Accident
made by billy -
Martin Lee Anderson Remembered
made by MGS -
Martin Lee Anderson Remembered
made by ksigman -
Martin Lee Anderson Remembered
made by Fed Up -
New Life for Miracle Strip Amusement Park
made by ginger
- Wheel of Justice
- Woman Charged with Murdering Grandson
- New Life for Miracle Strip Amusement Park
- American Postal Workers Union to Picket at USPS Public Meeting
- Winter Weather Related Information
- New Details on Mill Accident
- Scam Targets Cove
- Bank Robbery Suspect Still At Large
- Twelve-year-old Girl Transported to Hospital for Drug Overdose
- Out of Service Elevator Brings Complaints From Apartment Building Residents
12/02/09 - 03:21 PM
WASHINGTON (AP) - It’s a case that could have big implications for coastal communities around the country that are dealing with beach erosion.
The Supreme Court heard arguments today over whether homeowners in Florida must be compensated because a beach-widening project cost them their exclusive access to the Gulf of Mexico.
Six homeowners are challenging a state Supreme Court decision that allowed the designation of the new sand as public property, in an area where the homeowners had previously had exclusive access.
The Constitution requires governments to pay compensation when they take private property for public use. The court is being asked to rule for the first time that a court decision can amount to a taking of property.
But justices today appeared divided about whether the homeowners actually lost anything.
Justice Antonin Scalia noted that people “pay a lot more money for beachfront homes”—but he also said the homeowners received what sounded like a good deal when the sand was replaced.
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito appeared to favor the homeowners.
(Copyright 2009 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
First, we are not being sneaky and gathering your email or other information to sell to telemarketers or e-mail spam companies.
Registration on this site is required simply to allow us to keep people who would post discriminatory, threatening and harassing messages and comments from doing it again.
By having user registration, we hope to provide you with a better user experience. Please view WMBB.com's full Terms & Conditions